more brain > blog.html

Wikipedia is one of the few sites that should have an API but doesn’t. It’s a shame, considering it is one of the best sources for free quality content. Due to this limitation, we have to resort to the pre-historic art of screen scraping. why’s Hpricot is my favorite tool to do this. It uses a fast HTML scanner written in C using Ragel, the same technology that makes Mongrel so fast. It allows you to parse HTML using either CSS selectors or XPath, in a similar vein to jQuery.

The few Wikipedia clients out there only output data in Wikitext format or clear text. I wanted something that will reproduce the content with basic styling intact, so it can be republished in a similar fashion to Answers.com. Here is the code to do this:

require 'hpricot'
require 'open-uri'

items_to_remove = [
  "#contentSub",        #redirection notice
  "div.messagebox",     #cleanup data
  "#siteNotice",        #site notice
  "#siteSub",           #"From Wikipedia..." 
  "table.infobox",      #sidebar box
  "#jump-to-nav",       #jump-to-nav
  "div.editsection",    #edit blocks
  "table.toc",          #table of contents 
  "#catlinks"           #category links
  ]

doc = Hpricot open('wikipedia url')
@article = (doc/"#content").each do |content|
  #change /wiki/ links to point to full wikipedia path
  (content/:a).each do |link|
    unless link.attributes['href'].nil?
      if (link.attributes['href'][0..5] == "/wiki/")
        link.attributes['href'].sub!('/wiki/', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/')
      end
    end
  end  

  #remove unnecessary content and edit links
  items_to_remove.each { |x| (content/x).remove }

  #replace links to create new entries with plain text
  (content/"a.new").each do |link|
    link.parent.insert_before Hpricot.make(link.attributes['title']), link
  end.remove
end 

puts @article.inner_html

For comparison, here is a Wikiepdia article scraped using this script, and its cousin at Answers.com. Here is the original Wikipedia article. There are still a few things to be worked out, like filtering out Javascript and working with other languages. But I will leave that as an exercise for the reader!

If you are going to use this script, please don’t forget to give credit to Wikipedia and include a link to the original article. It looks like it already does add a Notes section with a link-back which isn’t on the original site. It must be checking the user agent of the browser and adding the line if it detects an unknown browser. You still have to include a link to the GNU Free Documentation License.

Update: _why makes some suggestions to improve this script, and adds a new method swap which eliminates the ugly end.remove syntax.